When comparing treatment options, which analysis focuses solely on who receives more benefit in monetary terms?

The analysis that focuses solely on who receives more benefit in monetary terms is cost-benefit analysis. This type of analysis quantifies both the costs and the benefits of a given treatment or intervention in monetary units. By calculating the net benefit, it allows for a straightforward comparison of the value derived from the expenditure on an intervention. The ultimate goal is to assess whether the benefits outweigh the costs and to what extent, making it a useful tool in healthcare decision-making.

Cost-minimization analysis, in contrast, is used when the outcomes of different interventions are assumed to be equivalent and focuses solely on comparing the costs to find the cheapest option. Cost-effectiveness analysis evaluates the relative costs and outcomes (effects) of two or more courses of action but does not necessarily express benefits in monetary terms. Budget impact analysis specifically examines the financial consequences of adopting a new intervention within a specific budget context, focusing on the monetary effects rather than a broader benefit perspective. These analyses play different roles and offer distinct insights, which is why identifying cost-benefit analysis as the correct answer is essential for understanding the financial implications of treatment options.